Editorial team,
and how we work.
RoofingTechPro is written by a small team working alongside a panel of licensed roofing contractors, public adjusters, and field-experienced inspectors. Here's how the content gets produced, who reviews it, and what we refuse to do.
Who writes
RoofingTechPro is an iSimplifyMe publication edited by a small in-house team with professional-review support from external state-licensed roofing contractors and licensed public adjusters in storm-belt states. All authorship is published as “The RoofingTechPro Editors” — anonymous “staff” bylines aren’t used as a marketing flourish; the editorial team carries the byline collectively.
How review works
Every state page is paired with a reviewer practicing in that state — typically a state-licensed roofing contractor for cost / material / licensing claims, plus a public adjuster for the insurance-claim framework where applicable. Reviewers look for accuracy against current state-board rules, reasonableness of cost ranges against their book of work, and absence of advice that drifts into unauthorized practice or coverage opinion.
What we don’t do
We don’t run advertorials. We don’t accept paid placements for contractors, manufacturers, or insurance carriers. We don’t partner with contractor lead-aggregator networks. We don’t soften the post-ITC solar economics to keep installers happy. We don’t recommend filing every claim — we recommend filing the claims that pencil out under our break-even framework, and walking away from the ones that don’t.
Voice
House voice, 2024 dial. Authoritative, plain-English, contrarian when contrarian is correct. We treat the reader as an adult with a real problem.
Corrections
Corrections policy lives on the methodology page. Email [email protected] with the page URL, the specific item, and your source. We log every correction in the page’s footer and update within 48 hours.